It feels dirty to use the word
"reboot" when talking about NBC's short-lived but very beloved series
Hannibal, but technically, that's
exactly what it is. Iconic characters were plucked from Thomas Harris'
celebrated novel series and reimagined, regendered, and reintroduced for newer
audiences. But unlike Batman, Superman, or James Bond, the act of ever daring
to think you could fill the shoes left behind by Anthony Hopkins, whose three
separate performances as Dr. Hannibal Lecter earned one Academy Award and
hundreds of millions at the box office, bordered on blasphemy. Props to Brian
Cox for originating the on-screen version of the character in Michael Mann's
underrated thriller Manhunter, but
with that out of the way, Hopkins' iteration was always going to go down in history as the definitive take on the
character. And that's because the character of Hannibal Lecter doesn't lend
itself to semi-annual change-ups like the array of comic book heroes or
international super-spies that by now have established the understanding that,
yeah, every five to ten years, a new face is going to step up to play them. So
when the Hannibal series was announced, everyone was very taken aback by the news, and rightfully so.
You mean to say the same network that aired The Voice and America's Got
Talent and, ugh, Grimm, had the
gall to think they could not only do the Lecter series justice, but could
sidestep TV standards and practices and include the grisly gore for which the
novels and subsequent adaptations became known? It was one of those ideas that
looked and sounded like a disaster, and it easily could have been, but Hannibal not only overcame everything
stacked against it, and not only did it somehow out-gore HBO, it's likely to go
down as one of the most beloved television series of all time, even if the
audience wasn't there for it.
And it went off the air exactly four years ago today.
All the credit in the world goes
to show-runner Bryan Fuller, who did the smartest thing anyone could
have possibly done in his situation: kept the bare essentials of the series, maintained
the most iconic and necessary aspects, and jettisoned the rest – enough to provide familiarity and keep
the readers and film fans happy, but enough to create the distance needed so it
didn't feel like holy ground was being desecrated. The casting also certainly
didn't hurt, as it was impeccable nearly across the board (except for Scott
Thompson, who, though lovable, was definitely miscast). Is it too early to
predict that Mads Mikkelsen's take on Dr. Hannibal "the Cannibal"
Lecter has become the new definitive version? Probably, although you'd likely
have a legion of Twitter fans ready to preach that gospel. One thing is for
certain, Fuller's Hannibal is the
first visual medium to accurately portray the very damaged soul that is Will
Graham, in keeping with his depiction in the first novel, Red Dragon. Though this was touched on with Manhunter, William Petersen's take was more distant and cold rather
than haunted and broken. And gosh knows what Ed Norton was trying to do with Red Dragon besides cash a check to fund
25th Hour, but except for a moist
brow and pit stains, his Will Graham seemed pretty all right. But this version
of Will Graham is utterly damaged, and that's evident from his very first
on-screen appearance during which he's walking through blood impossibly frozen
in mid-air in the same way stars look plotted into the night sky – and this as he babbles to himself in
the first person...as the serial killer responsible for the carnage.
Once you wipe away the serial
killers, the violent art, the cheeky and recognizable mannerisms of Hannibal
Lecter, and the touchstones of a post-CSI television landscape,
what's revealed is what Hannibal was
actually about the entire time – that two men from very opposite sides
of the spectrum could develop mutual love for each other, and through their
opposite natures struggle with this love and what it means. And this isn't to
write off Hannibal as some
underlying gay drama about two men in the closet, because that would just
cheapen what Fuller intended. The love on display between Will Graham and
Hannibal Lecter can be anything you
want it to be – friendship, romance,
brotherhood, or other. The kind of love doesn't matter – it's window dressing – but just that it's there, and that it's challenging both of
their respective natures, is what's made the show so compelling.
Hannibal was a critical favorite from its first episode, and what
little audience tuned in did so with devotion. But, as some folks know and some
don't, it doesn't matter how devoted the audience is, how beloved the
characters are, and how much praise the show receives from critics. If no one's
watching the show, then no one's watching the ads, and if no one's watching the
ads, then companies aren't going to buy the ad time, and without that revenue,
there is no show. That's the long and short of it, and it sucks, but that's
business. So call it really misguided that NBC treated Hannibal like a ping pong ball, changing its air day three separate
times, two of which occurred during the struggling final season, which saw it
transition from a straightforward procedural/serial killer program to a
European-set, esoteric, dreamlike quasi stage play filled with characters
musings about their identities and natures and all kinds of heavy ideas that
aren't going to grab newer audiences. (Not
even scenes of kaleidoscopic lesbianism lured in the newbs.)
The third (and final?) season of Hannibal is disappointing only in the
sense that, had it all gone according to plan, it would have instead served as
the exact middle of the series' overall run. Seasons four through six were set
to adapt all the other books, including the maligned Hannibal Rising, and conclude with a season of entirely original
material, keeping both avid readers of the novels and viewers of the show
entirely in the dark about how that would all end.
That didn't happen.
Instead we received a smidgen of Hannibal Rising married to a fleshed-out
version of Hannibal and the third act
of Red Dragon. Though it was never part of the plan, Fuller
and his show-runners did an excellent job of closing out all the lingering
story lines, minus the somewhat abruptness of season three transitioning yet again halfway through – but only to include what was meant to
come much later. Yes, it was certainly disappointing that the series never
matured to the degree of reaching the story arc of The Silence of the Lambs – the most famous novel and
adaptation of them all – but what's
even more disappointing is never getting to experience how Fuller's version of
that arc would have looked, or potentially seeing Will Graham and Clarice
Starling on screen together. (Gasp! My nerd heart!)
Hannibal also liked to have its fun, and not just within Thomas Harris' Lecterverse. A fair number of homages and nods to other famous horror properties were sprinkled throughout. Some of these were very under-the-surface, including a brief moment during season three while Dr. Bedelia Du Maurier (Gillian Anderson) is shopping in a store filled with fine looking dinner table decor where a slight riff on selections from Goblin's score for George A. Romero's Dawn of the Dead can be heard on the soundtrack. (Amusingly, Romero himself enjoyed a brief cameo in The Silence of the Lambs, along with famed producer Roger Corman, who gave Jonathan Demme his start in directing.) And then, of course, there's the cameo from the bathroom featured in The Shining:
Hannibal also liked to have its fun, and not just within Thomas Harris' Lecterverse. A fair number of homages and nods to other famous horror properties were sprinkled throughout. Some of these were very under-the-surface, including a brief moment during season three while Dr. Bedelia Du Maurier (Gillian Anderson) is shopping in a store filled with fine looking dinner table decor where a slight riff on selections from Goblin's score for George A. Romero's Dawn of the Dead can be heard on the soundtrack. (Amusingly, Romero himself enjoyed a brief cameo in The Silence of the Lambs, along with famed producer Roger Corman, who gave Jonathan Demme his start in directing.) And then, of course, there's the cameo from the bathroom featured in The Shining:
Bryan Fuller has openly stated
(lovingly) that he wanted Hannibal
to maintain the certain level of pretension that was evident in the writing of
Thomas Harris' series. Not only is that approach present in the philosophical
and at-times poetic dialogue, but in the flawless production design and visual
presentation – lots of slow motion,
lots of reverse engineering, but never in a way that feels exploitative. The
visual tricks serve the show's aesthetic and the minds of its characters. Even
if the plot or characters of Hannibal
do nothing for you, there's no denying it's a gorgeous show to look at. Colors
are vivid, though they often depend on shades of gray. Shadows drape across
nearly everything; even scenes set in the height of daylight maintain a certain
darkness. Detail is as fine as Dr. Lecter's smashing wardrobe.
Sometimes it's the less showy
audio presentation that makes for the most immersive experience – this is the show's design. Hannibal is a very intimately presented
show, showing restraint and preferring the sound of moving air over garish and
cheap Foley effects. The unorthodox and unusual musical score by composer Brian
Reitzell (30 Days of Night), filled
with clangs, bashes, and non-melodic ominous tones created a sound that would somehow define a show that was,
itself, without definition. Working well in tandem with the show's quiet
design, Reitzell's musical design – relying
often on the pounding of drums with loosened drum heads and slamming metal – would shatter the perceived solitude induced
by the art-like images to unnerve the audience with little effort.
To reiterate, NBC kept Hannibal going for as long as they could while remaining fiscally solvent. Unfortunately the viewership wasn't there to justify keeping the show on the air. In this age of Hulu and Amazon/Netflix Originals, everyone held out hope that the series would be picked up by another distributor. For a while, Fuller et al. were hopeful – and media websites were goodheartedly but irresponsibly muddying the waters by predicting the series would "likely" be picked up – but so far, there have been no firm developments in this regard. Maybe we can look at Lionsgate calling its home video release simply "Season Three" rather than "The Final Season," which has become the home video tradition for television swan songs, as a sign of hope that we haven't seen the end of Bryan Fuller's Hannibal.
Does season three mark the end of
Hannibal, or is there life in this
new universe yet? Fuller et al. are optimistic about completing the arc in
movie form, which is a nice idea but seems unlikely. How does one adapt a
series that was cancelled due to low viewership into one or several films if
funding has proven to be an issue? If anything, Fuller has established he's
full of surprises, so never say never. The final moments of season three work
well as both a season finale and a series finale, so should this, indeed, be
the end of the strangest courting ever made, let it not be said that Hannibal didn't go out in style.